Re: (Fwd) EOS and IR film

["Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>]

On  8 Oct 96 at 20:43, Tom Benedict wrote:

> The results are a little disappointing, but not as bad as I might've
> expected.  I haven't contact printed the negs yet, but I did develop
> them last night.  The upshot is that the sprocket hole area is completely
> blocked out.  It matches the highest density area in any of the images.
> The good part is that it only covers the sprocket holes.
> 
> The bad part is that there is considerable fogging into the image area.
> I'd say the lower 1/4 of the image is affected to some extent.  Two
> ways to handle it, both of which I'm going to try:
> 

Tom, I was browsing to see which EOS camera the above applies to, but 
I can't find it. I just saw someone on r.p.e.35mm reporting about the 
EOS 5/A2 not fogging; but without mentioning film type.
What camera did you use?
I did find another message; the 50/ElanII fogs 4-5mm into the image 
area....


 
--
Bye,

       _/      _/       _/_/_/_/_/       _/_/_/_/_/
     _/  _/  _/               _/       _/  _/  _/
     _/  _/ illem    _/     _/ an    _/  _/  _/ arkerink
                     _/_/_/  



      The desire to understand 
is sometimes far less intelligent than
     the inability to understand


<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]

------------------------------

Topic No. 22