Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: 4x5 field camera considerations - Reply
- From: "Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 4x5 field camera considerations - Reply
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 14:19:23 +0000
On 16 Dec 96 at 6:59, Murray White wrote:
> >With 35mm camera's the golden rule is to close aperture 2-3 stops
> >from the highest opening (best performance of the lens),
>
> Willem- this seems a bit confusing. What is highest opening? Is it
> not preferable to speak in terms of widest and smallest aperature. Does
> highest mean smallest opening, largest # ie f22 or because you use the term
> close aperature, do you mean highest to mean widest, ie f2?
Sorry, I ment largest aperture....;-))
(ie low F-number)
> If highest and smallest are equal then you are not closing the
> aperature but rather opening it. If highest is widest aperature, then the
> faster the lens is, the wider the optimum aperature would be. ie a f 1.8
> lens stopped down 2 stops f 5.6 (approx) yet the minimum aperature will
> probably be f16.
Nah, most lenses go down to at least f22 or f32.
> Perhaps I am incorrect but I believe the optimum aperature is 1 stop
> open from the minimum aperature of the lens. This will work with all formats
> I believe. You large format users could correct me on this.
Sorry, never heard of that rule....8-))
The 2-3 stops closing from largest aperture almost always results an
aperture in the middle of the range, which almost never equals just
1 stop opening from smallest aperture (high F-number).
I'll just have to buy a true APO lens to overcome my focus
problem....unless Canon introduces a CF-option to get IR-focus
correction within AF, a la Konica Hexar.
I have vented this opinion many times to Canon rep's high
up....who knows what future will bring for us IR-nuts....;-))
--
Bye,
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ illem _/ _/ an _/ _/ _/ arkerink
_/_/_/
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
------------------------------
Topic No. 10
|