Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Ektachrome IR 200ASA/+2push vs 50ASA/no push
- From: "Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Ektachrome IR 200ASA/+2push vs 50ASA/no push
- Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 23:29:48 +0000
On 23 Mar 97 at 15:37, Robert Long wrote:
> I note one post on the Usenet referring to a rumor of a version that
> can be processed in C-41. But I suspect somebody is just confusing
> the new EIR with Kodak's new answer to Ilford XP-2. I see nothing
> about C-41 in the EIR data sheet.
I agree with the reason for confusion, but note that even the old
Ektachrome can be developed as neg film (almost certain without
orange mask, so a clean reversed color set....might be hard to
print....anyone?). I don't think I have an explicit note about this
on my homepage, but I did read about this in Guenter Spitzing's "IR-
und UV-Fotografie".
Is there any other literature addressing this reversal issue?
--
Bye,
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ illem _/ _/ an _/ _/ _/ arkerink
_/_/_/
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
------------------------------
|