Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Smaller than optimal pinholes -Reply
- From: "Timothy E. Coffer" <COFFER.TIM@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Smaller than optimal pinholes -Reply
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 1997 09:10:40 -0400
George,
Just out of curiosity, what was your optimum size pinhole on your 4X5
for making wide-angle exposures of around 90-120 degrees coverage?
Thanks in advance,
Tim Coffer
>>> George L Smyth <GLSmyth@xxxxxxx> 06/06/97 06:39am >>>
I made a range of pinholes for my 4X5 and tried them out. I found that
holes close to the optimum size appeared to give similar results.
George
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
------------------------------
|