Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Smaller than optimal pinholes -Reply

  • From: George L Smyth <GLSmyth@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Smaller than optimal pinholes -Reply
  • Date: Mon, 09 Jun 1997 17:23:54 -0400
Timothy E. Coffer wrote:
> 
> George,
> Just out of curiosity, what was your optimum size pinhole on your 4X5
> for making wide-angle exposures of around 90-120 degrees coverage?

A 0.42mm hole works nicely with my camera, where the infinity stops are
set for a 127mm lens.  If you are referring to the images on my Web
page, they were made with a 1.5" focal length camera (VERY wide angle)
and the hole is about 0.23mm.

george

- -- 
 Handmade Photographic Images     
  http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------