Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Ilford SFX 200 in ColorFoto 7/97
- From: Helmut Faugel TE <htf@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Ilford SFX 200 in ColorFoto 7/97
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 16:15:52 +0200 (MET DST)
On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, Willem-Jan Markerink wrote:
> On 23 Jun 97 at 18:15, Helmut Faugel TE wrote:
>
> > What else can I squezze out of this article? Hm, most of us know that
> > HIE is a dog to use, you have to change the film in total darkness, you
>
> Have you read FotoMagazin 5/97?
No! This magazine contains so much crap, the latest example is the
slide film test in 7/97, they found that you have to add 1,5 stops at
10s for Kodak Elite 100 II! My pesonal observation is that this film
does not show any reciprocity failure up to several minutes!
> They briefly mention Ektachrome IR among other slide films, and state
> that it must be darkloaded. I believe I have seen this (false) claim
> before, I think on the Kodak site, right?
The german datasheets about Kodak IR-films claim that this films must
be loaded in total darkness, so its no wonder that ColorFoto writes
the same.
> Though the recently mentioned lack of antihalation layer does make
> one suspicious....
The author writes that the due to the lack of the antihalation layer
the filmbase guides light in the 'box' (sorry don't know the term).
BTW: Once I had the chance to see how good antihalation layers work.
My trusty old Minolta X-700 crashed on concrete and the back
opened, it took some seconds to close the back. Seven
frames were exposed (five were total ruined, the two other
showed partly).
> A friend rated 9 DIN (6 ASA) with #87, -30 DIN with #87C. -30 DIN is
> 13 stops slower than +9 DIN....8-))
> Ilford ID-11 (1+1), 25 min.
Wow, -30 DIN, thats 0.00125 ASA! Using the 'Sunny 16' will give you
800 seconds exposure time plus reciprocity failure ... try a long
time exposure with one or two hours ...
BTW: Does the negative show any IR-effect?
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Helmut FAUGEL | Tel. : +49 / 089 / 3299 2245
Max-Planck-Institut f. Plasmaphysik | Fax : +49 / 089 / 3299 2558
Boltzmannstr. 2 | E-Mail : faugel@xxxxxxxxxx
D-85748 Garching bei Muenchen |
Germany |
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
------------------------------
|