Re: Ilford SFX 200 in ColorFoto 7/97

["Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>]

On 23 Jun 97 at 18:15, Helmut Faugel TE wrote:

> What else can I squezze out of this article? Hm, most of us know that
> HIE is a dog to use, you have to change the film in total darkness, you

Have you read FotoMagazin 5/97?
They briefly mention Ektachrome IR among other slide films, and state 
that it must be darkloaded. I believe I have seen this (false) claim 
before, I think on the Kodak site, right?
Though the recently mentioned lack of antihalation layer does make 
one suspicious....

> BTW: someone in de.rec.fotografie reported that he used a Wratten #87
>      to expose SFX 200, but he had to add 12 stops to get printable
>      negatives.

A friend rated 9 DIN (6 ASA) with #87, -30 DIN with #87C. -30 DIN is 
13 stops slower than +9 DIN....8-))
Ilford ID-11 (1+1), 25 min.



 

- -- 
Bye,

Willem-Jan Markerink


      The desire to understand 
is sometimes far less intelligent than
     the inability to understand


<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------

End of Infrared-Digest V0 #77
*****************************