Re: Cross Processing EIR

["J.Wood" <shopper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 06:20 PM 9/26/97, you wrote:
>At 10:25 AM 9/26/97 +0100, you wrote:
>>Hello All,
>>I took advice form a past post and tried cross processing of EIR.  Maybe 
>>I read the post wrong, but I recall the person saying that he got thin 
>>negs @ ISO 200 and would try 100 next time.  There was no mention of a 
>>filter so I didn't use one.  I shot the film @ ISO 100.  The negs came 
>>back so dense that I could hardly make anything out.  Next time I will 
>>try ISO 400 or 800.
>>-Nick McIntosh
>> using Greg Pease's computer
>>*
>>Nick, stop right where you are.  Your problem was in "..filter so I didn't
>use one."  You  have a fast panchromatic film that way.  You want to use a
>filter, #25 red or other appropriate (such as 87c) filters.  With a #25 and
>ISO of 100 for starts (hand held meter) and normal development in D-76 or
>HC-110 should should do well.  
>
>Jim
>
Excuse my comments above.  Never write things at late hours after a long
day.  I totally misread the incoming and was thinking HIE.  I will now go
back to bed.

Jim

*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------

End of Infrared-Digest V0 #224
******************************