Re: IR Film and Airport X-Rays

[kiodo@xxxxxxx (Sun Demon)]

>> >Jeff Spirer wrote:
>> >
>> >> Is there any reason to believe that scanners at the airport will
>> have
>> >> any
>> >> more effect on IR film than regular film.  I don't want to try a
>> hand
>> >> check, since I am sure that some guard somewhere will insist on
>> >> opening the
>> >> canisters.  However, I expect to be in country (ies) that a) may
>> have
>> >> the
>> >> machines turned up, and b) are highly unlikely to have processing
>> >> facilities.  They will have to go through unprocessed and processed
>> at
>> >>
>> >> least two times (i.e., at least four times total.)
>> >>
>> >> Jeff Spirer
>> >
Why don't you switch to Konica? It's about 5 times slower, and even hand
check would be no problem.
    Gae

*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------