Re: Need feedback on move into medium format for IR

["David M. Young" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 03:31 PM 7/6/98, you wrote:
>To avoid consensus, and remain a curmudgeon, I think you should give
>serious consideration to the 4x5 format.  You will have a negative which
>takes the process into another realm and the cost is less than most medium
>format.  There are unending used 4x5 field cameras.  They are labor
>intensive and awkward but deserve serious consideration. If you don't like
>loading sheet film backs, there must be a 70mm film back available for a
>4x5.  
>Jim

Thanks Jim... I actually considered that and discussed it with my wife
(after all, it is she who is demanding that I go to a larger negative...
Yes really!!).  Her take is that we go with the medium format now, since
I'll use it for other types of photography as well, and consider going with
4x5 later if this takes off for me and it pays for itself.

Cheers!
D.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David M. Young  |  david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  |  http://www.cloudance.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------