Re: choices of cameras for IR: question David M. Young

["David M. Young" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 07:50 PM 7/6/98 -0600, you wrote:
>David,
>I read all the advices you got on your question. What I didn't see was
>that special remark about the Bronica ETRSi for which is available a so
>called 135W wide filmback. This back accomodates 35 mm HIE and produces
>negatives of the size 24 x 54 mm! This is 50% more than the ordinary 35
>mm negative. This could be an alternative for the 70 mm stuff. I use
>this 135 Wide back myself and there are more friends on this LIST having
>this camera and back. I know this is still not 70 mm, however 70 mm film
>and filmbacks are very expensive and bulky to handle. These aspects
>should also be taken into account! Have fun!

Oh absolutely!  I definitly plan on getting a 135W back... almost like
getting a Horizon in the bargain.... Hey... I said *almost*  ;-)

Cheers!
D.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David M. Young  |  david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  |  http://www.cloudance.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------