Re: IR Images lightened/adjusted this AM

[George L Smyth <GLSmyth@xxxxxxx>]

Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
> 
>   Hi All,
> 
>         taking all suggestions and doing my best via a handy
>         little piece of software David led me to (I think it was
>         David, anyway) I just now reput the InfraRed Section of
>         images from the Oregon Coast (USA) to my website. They
>         should be much better now for viewing. I would appreciate
>         any comments as to my success in this endeavor -- email is
>         fine, or the list -- your choice.

The images are very nice.  It looks like you've used your 20mm lens more than I.
<g>

I will offer two suggestions for you to consider or ignore.  One would be to
have fewer thumbnails on the page, as it took quite a bit of time to load the
whole page in.  If you placed handfuls on separate pages things would load
faster.

The second suggestion is to have the images (not the thumbnails) larger.  I know
that space on your provider's system might be an issue, so I don't know if this
is possible.  A larger image, however, would make for better viewing.

The important thing is that you've got some fine images.

Well done -

george

- -- 

Handmade Photographic Images
http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------

End of Infrared-Digest V0 #668
******************************