Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Isn't IR LED an oxymoron?


  • From: George L Smyth <GLSmyth@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Isn't IR LED an oxymoron?
  • Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 17:31:07 -0400

Theo Benson wrote:
> 
> IR and UV are both potentially dangerous... I burned my corneas once while
> using shortwave UV in a mineral fluorescence display. Took days to recover.
> 
> On a different note, has anyone used the new Ektachrome IR (EIR) with an 87C
> filter instead of a yellow filter?

I've shot it with a #25 filter - boring.  It was a rather monochromatic image. 
Use of a #87C would definitely yield you a monochrome image - pretty boring
unless there's something more going on.

george

- -- 

Handmade Photographic Images
http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------