RE: Isn't IR LED an oxymoron?

[Theo Benson <TBenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks. Guess I'll stick with a #15 yellow filter. I LIKE crimson grass and
blue picket fences...

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	George L Smyth [SMTP:GLSmyth@xxxxxxx]
> Sent:	Monday, July 20, 1998 2:31 PM
> To:	infrared@xxxxx
> Subject:	Re: Isn't IR LED an oxymoron?
> 
> Theo Benson wrote:
> > 
> > IR and UV are both potentially dangerous... I burned my corneas once
> while
> > using shortwave UV in a mineral fluorescence display. Took days to
> recover.
> > 
> > On a different note, has anyone used the new Ektachrome IR (EIR) with an
> 87C
> > filter instead of a yellow filter?
> 
> I've shot it with a #25 filter - boring.  It was a rather monochromatic
> image. 
> Use of a #87C would definitely yield you a monochrome image - pretty
> boring
> unless there's something more going on.
> 
> george
> 
> -- 
> 
> Handmade Photographic Images
> http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/
> *
> ****
> *******
> ******************************************************
> *  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
> *         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
> *       to                                           *
> *         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
> *----------------------------------------------------*
> *   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
> *  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
> ******************************************************
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------