Re: ISO for IR film

["kim navarre" <navarre@xxxxxxxxx>]

define "great results", do you mean increased contrast?

KLMN

----------
> From: ANDPPH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: infrared@xxxxx
> Cc: ANDPPH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: ISO for IR film
> Date: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 8:28 PM
> 
> > Mankin.Larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > I am a new user of IR Film and have experimented with ISO's from 50
to 400
> > > with interesting results.  Can IR be used at 800 or 1600?  Has anyone
tried
> > > it and what results have you gotten?
> > > Any help will be appreciated!!          Larry
> 
> Yup ... I use it at a relative index of 2400 or 3200 but then I meter
through
> an 87C in the reflected mode with a Gossen Luna-Pro with CdS cell.
Results are
> great!
> 
> Andy  o o  0 0 o . o  Andrew Davidhazy, Imaging and Photo Tech
>        \/\/\/\/\/\/   http://www.rit.edu/~andpph  716-475-2592  
> ________|        |____________________________________________
> 
> *
> ****
> *******
> ******************************************************
> *  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
> *         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
> *       to                                           *
> *         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
> *----------------------------------------------------*
> *   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
> *  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
> ******************************************************
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************