Re: ISO for IR film

[ANDPPH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

> define "great results", do you mean increased contrast?

Good question! How about "the negatives I get are easy to print".

I should add that there is no implication that the negatives are any more
"great" than those I make in other situations as well. To me "great" depends on
the person making that statement. I think very few of my photos are truly
"great" but some are at least "great" to me ... hey, this is getting off the 
IR thread!

take care,

Andy  o o  0 0 o . o  Andrew Davidhazy, Imaging and Photo Tech
       \/\/\/\/\/\/   http://www.rit.edu/~andpph  716-475-2592  
________|        |____________________________________________

*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************