Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Test on Kodak EIR film
- From: Helmut Faugel TE <htf@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Test on Kodak EIR film
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 11:51:02 +0100 (MET)
On Mon, 26 Oct 1998, Willem-Jan Markerink wrote:
> On 25 Oct 98 at 20:36, Symon K.W. Wong wrote:
>
> > Can anybody explain to me the phenomenon described as follows :
> >
> > It's a test on Kodak EIR film by shooting at 2 seashore scenes at about
> > 11:00 am. I made 10 shots per scene with 5 in one exposure set while 5
> > in another equivalent set. All shots for one scene were taken almost at
> > the same time (+/- 1 min. between the first 5 and the subseq. 5).
>
> I recall that Helmut Faugel has done some Schwarzschild testing, and
> concluded that (infra?)red sensitivity drops quite significantly with
> longer exposures. 1/500s vs 1/15s might be enough to trigger this
> effect....
EIR does not need any compensation between 1/1000s und 1/100s, but
at 1/10s it needs +1 stop and a CC20B filter according to the
data sheet, or in other words it shows a strong color shift at
exposure times you do not even think of reciprocity failure.
> This triggered also another idea: to decrease the extreme red tones
> with E-6 development, one could add a dense ND filter....problem is
> that ordinary ND filters don't block IR, so you would effectively
> block all visible, including red, but not infrared.
Right!
> OTOH, I believe
> that the very dense ND filters contain metal particles to achieve
> this density in the first place, instead of organic dyes....and
> metal blocks IR just as good.
Sometimes I use a B+W 113 (ND 4.0, eats up 13 1/3 stops) and this
cause a strong red cast on my color slides, even on films that are
not sensitive to reciprocity failure and color shift (Sensia 100 II,
EliteChrome 100 & 200). I've got a call from B+W after I asked them
at a photo fair about this problem and the answer was that this
filter shows 2% transmission at 800nm, this is only ND 1.7 instead
of ND 4.0 at 550 nm.
What I could do is running a Test using my Thousend Oaks ND 4 filter
which consosts of a thin metalfilm on glass, but at first Willem-Jan
has to keep all the bad weather away from germany ;-)
--
Helmut Faugel
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|