Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Fwd: IR in darkness


  • From: George L Smyth <GLSmyth@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Fwd: IR in darkness
  • Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 08:47:31 -0500

Sorry, but I don't have the answer they want, which uses the dreaded "T" word -
test.  One can bracket a few shots, remove them from the camera and develop
them.  In that way, film can be saved.  Using flash at night with infrared film
is somewhat a jump from never having tried the film at all, so perhaps this
isn't really the best place to start.

george

Spearmint wrote:
> 
> HELP!!!
> 
> Sorry to do this again, guess I should drop the email link from my page,
> can anyone help with the following questions I've been sent??
> 
> Thanks in advance :)
> TTFN
> Gavin
> 
> ---------------- Begin Forwarded Message ----------------
> Date:        29/1/99 6:56 pm
> Received:    29/1/99 10:51 pm
> To:          infrared@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Hello,
> I have a few questions about infrared photography, which I am going to try
> my hand at for the first time tonight. I have asked a lot of people a lot
> of the basic questions, which leaves the more difficult ones for you.
> Maybe
> you can help. First of all, I am going to be shooting exclusively in the
> dark, outside at night. I will be using a flash, and will be shooting at
> 1/30 and/or 1/60, and will be bracketing between f 1.7 and f 10. Does this
> sound right so far? I know that the film really can't be rated with a
> standard ASA number, and also the aperture has very little to do with the
> image, but my main concern right now is not to ruin the whole roll. I'd
> like to start right and get at least a few good pictures out of  this. My
> interest is in capturing infrared energy that is not visible to the human
> eye for scientific purposes, not artistic. Do you have any other
> suggestions? I have a 25 visible red filter that I am going to be using
> for
> the time being, but I understand that there are three other filters that I
> might be able to use, the 87, 87c, and the 89. Can you tell me anything
> about the differences between these, and how the images that they will
> produce will differ from the 25 - again, bearing in mind that my goal is
> not artistic but scientific. Any help you can provide would be greatly
> appreciated.
> 
> ----------------- End Forwarded Message -----------------
> 
> ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
> 
> State the problem in words as clearly as possible.
> 
> ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
> 
> Coolmint Designs.   http://www.coolmint.com
> 
> ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
> 
> *
> ****
> *******
> ******************************************************
> *  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
> *         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
> *       to                                           *
> *         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
> *----------------------------------------------------*
> *   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
> *  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
> ******************************************************

-- 

Handmade Photographic Images
http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************