Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Fwd: IR in darkness
- From: George L Smyth <GLSmyth@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Fwd: IR in darkness
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 08:47:31 -0500
Sorry, but I don't have the answer they want, which uses the dreaded "T" word -
test. One can bracket a few shots, remove them from the camera and develop
them. In that way, film can be saved. Using flash at night with infrared film
is somewhat a jump from never having tried the film at all, so perhaps this
isn't really the best place to start.
george
Spearmint wrote:
>
> HELP!!!
>
> Sorry to do this again, guess I should drop the email link from my page,
> can anyone help with the following questions I've been sent??
>
> Thanks in advance :)
> TTFN
> Gavin
>
> ---------------- Begin Forwarded Message ----------------
> Date: 29/1/99 6:56 pm
> Received: 29/1/99 10:51 pm
> To: infrared@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hello,
> I have a few questions about infrared photography, which I am going to try
> my hand at for the first time tonight. I have asked a lot of people a lot
> of the basic questions, which leaves the more difficult ones for you.
> Maybe
> you can help. First of all, I am going to be shooting exclusively in the
> dark, outside at night. I will be using a flash, and will be shooting at
> 1/30 and/or 1/60, and will be bracketing between f 1.7 and f 10. Does this
> sound right so far? I know that the film really can't be rated with a
> standard ASA number, and also the aperture has very little to do with the
> image, but my main concern right now is not to ruin the whole roll. I'd
> like to start right and get at least a few good pictures out of this. My
> interest is in capturing infrared energy that is not visible to the human
> eye for scientific purposes, not artistic. Do you have any other
> suggestions? I have a 25 visible red filter that I am going to be using
> for
> the time being, but I understand that there are three other filters that I
> might be able to use, the 87, 87c, and the 89. Can you tell me anything
> about the differences between these, and how the images that they will
> produce will differ from the 25 - again, bearing in mind that my goal is
> not artistic but scientific. Any help you can provide would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> ----------------- End Forwarded Message -----------------
>
> ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
>
> State the problem in words as clearly as possible.
>
> ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
>
> Coolmint Designs. http://www.coolmint.com
>
> ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
>
> *
> ****
> *******
> ******************************************************
> * To remove yourself from this list, send: *
> * UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
> * to *
> * MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
> *----------------------------------------------------*
> * For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
> * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
> ******************************************************
--
Handmade Photographic Images
http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|