Re:Answers to several EIR questi

[George L Smyth <glsmyth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 25 Sep 1999, Gary Beasley wrote:

> That doesn't indicate a lack of antihalation, it shows how the felt fails
> to stop the infrared from coming in. The banding is just where the film was
> shined on through the slot. If it lacked antihalation you would get nice
> halos around any bright object just like you do with HIE, which obviously
> doesn't happen. This is the same pattern that occurs if the felt is damaged
> on a reloadable cassette. This still indicates that Kodaks recommendation
> for loading in the dark is a good one.

EIR does not have an anti-halation layer (checked with Kodak just to make
sure).

george

---
Handmade Photographic Images
http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/

*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************