Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re:Answers to several EIR questi


  • From: Gary Beasley <beasleyglb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re:Answers to several EIR questi
  • Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 11:26:22 -0400

>Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:29:00 EDT
>From: "Rolland Elliott" <rolland_elliott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Answers to several EIR questi

>EIR does NOT have an antihalation layer.  To experience this for your self, 
>load the film in fairly bright light (say in partial shade around noontime 
>on a sunny day) rate your film at ISO=640, meter through a #12 yellow 
>filter, and E-6 push process the film two stops. You’ll get nice red bands 
>through the first 8 or 10 frames, exactly like the bands of density you get 
>when you load HIE in light.
>
That doesn't indicate a lack of antihalation, it shows how the felt fails
to stop the infrared from coming in. The banding is just where the film was
shined on through the slot. If it lacked antihalation you would get nice
halos around any bright object just like you do with HIE, which obviously
doesn't happen. This is the same pattern that occurs if the felt is damaged
on a reloadable cassette. This still indicates that Kodaks recommendation
for loading in the dark is a good one.
Gary Beasley
http://beasleyglb.home.mindspring.com/

*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************