Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Development of Konica 750
At 05:08 PM 8/2/00 -0700, you wrote:
>I have noticed that my Konica 750 contacts do not produce a good, crisp
>white in the labels and frame numbers along the film rebate when the
>contacts are printed for minimum time to produce maximum black. On the
>film, the frame numbers are a middle gray. This has been true for me
>with both Rodinal and Xtol development, and I thought it was just a
>property of Konica 750 film.
You've actually got things around the wrong way. Expose for the whites in
a print and adjust the contrast for the blacks. What you have described
here is overexposing a print on a paper with too low a contrast. I wouldn't
adjust your processing until you get the printing right (unless you want to
use this particular paper)
>Then on a recent roll I increased development time because I had a hunch
>that the subject would produce low contrast, even in IR; and for this
>roll the film labeling is nearly white in the 'properly printed'
>contacts.
The two are completely separate things. The frame numbers are put on with a
fixed exposure. If you increase your processing then they will be lighter
in the print. What your subject looks like depends on a lot of other
factors (exposure, lighting conditions, subject matter etc...) which have
absolutely nothing to do with frame numbers.
>Since the usual benchmarks for zone system exposure and development are
>not available for B&W IR photography, I'm thinking that the film rebate
>may be a good indicator for development.
If the film rebate picks up density then it is a good indication that you
are overprocessing. If you have a black part of your image next to the
edge of a frame and you have bracketed exposures then you would pick a
frame around the point where the black part of your image began to pick up
some density compared to the film rebate. This will give you the shortest
exposure (best highlight detail) which has the best shadow detail BUT it is
not necessarily an indicator of good processing. This will depend on what
the highlight detail on this frame is like as well.
Film: Expose for shadow detail (of final print), process for highlight detail
Print: Expose for highlight detail, contrast for shadow detail.
Forget about the appearance of frame numbers, your image is the only thing
that matters.
If you're trying to get a direct comparison between contact prints and
enlargements, remember that contact prints will have a lower contrast than
enlargements.
Cheers
Ben
===================================
http://www.bigbenpublishing.com.au/
===================================
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|