Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

RE: NIKON autofocus choices and IR

  • From: "Charles Jay Pilzer" <cjp@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: NIKON autofocus choices and IR
  • Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:50:38 -0400
Why do think that the F5 and the F100 are not suitable for IR?  They have
different autofocus methods.

cj

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-infrared@xxxxx [mailto:owner-infrared@xxxxx]On Behalf Of
> Jaap Los
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 2:36 PM
> To: infrared@xxxxx
> Subject: Re: NIKON autofocus choices and IR
>
>
> The 80 is indeed not suitable for IR  I suspect that the 100
> and the 5 are
> also not suitable for IR. Other members of this list will
> react on this, I'm
> sure. The 90 series and the 4 are OK.

*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************