Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Back to the black spot issue
- From: "paul vandepitte" <paulvandepitte@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Back to the black spot issue
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 20:02:26 GMT
I do not really beleive in problems with manufacturing: within the same
package of IR-film (Kodak 4x5), I hade some with and others without. There
was a clear realtion between the processing and the occurence of the spots
(either the neg's processed at the same time do have the spots or don't),
although I proces my neg's always exactly the same...
Paul
>From: "Don Bryant" <dsbryant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: infrared@xxxxx
>To: <infrared@xxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Back to the black spot issue
>Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:22:04 -0400
>
>Heather,
>
>
> > Hi All!
> > Until this recent thread I had not run into an issue with these spots.
>
>I think you have three choices:
>
>Since you are scanning the negs you can retouch the black spots digitally
>and print the image to file or to paper. If you print to file you can have
>a
>new negative made (with a new set of imperfections :-) ).
>
>If you want to print the defective negative in the darkroom you can bleach
>the spot white on the print and then retouch with spot tone. I've bleached
>spots as large as a couple of match heads and then retouched them with spot
>tone and I can't even tell where I've done the retouching. And this is with
>either warm or cold toned papers, toned and untoned. Since HIE is grainy
>this is easy to get away with.
>
>But if you want to avoid bleaching each print then you can opaque the spots
>on film (very difficult in 35mm format but doable). When you do this you
>will still have to spot the white spots on the prints but it may save you
>time with the bleaching.
>
>The lab didn't do anything wrong. The black spots are a defect in the
>manufacturing of the film. This problem has been discussed ad nauseam here
>on the list and I'm sure your post will start yet another round of whining
>from the usual suspects who like to do so about this problem.
>
>Sorry, I wish I could give a more reasonable solution but I don't know of
>any. Perhaps someone else can suggest an easier method for eliminating or
>dealing with this problem.
>
>Frankly I think that if you are going to print negatives in the traditional
>manner you need to expect to have to spot and retouch film and or paper as
>the need arises. It isn't fun but it is a necessary skill required to
>produce a top notch print. Just be thankful that you don't shoot sheet
>film!
>:-)
>
>
>Good luck,
>
>Don Bryant
>
>*
>****
>*******
>******************************************************
>* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
>* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
>* to *
>* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
>*----------------------------------------------------*
>* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
>* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
>******************************************************
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|