Re: Web site/New images

[Geoff McAuliffe <mcauliff@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Brewer, Kevan" wrote:

> Keith,
>
> Thanks for looking and your encouraging comments. The SFX200 pictures were
> taken on a sunny day - in July I think. I rated the film at the suggested 200
> and initially tried metering through the filter on my EOS 10, bracketing a
> stop each way usually.
>
> However, after a few shots I was a bit worried that the meter was giving me
> too much exposure so I decided to rate the film lower and meter without the
> filter. I rated it at 20 - just over 3 stops down. On looking at the negatives
> this was a good decision since the earlier shots were somewhat overexposed.
> (My initial attempts at HIE proved that my EOS 10's meter is not particularly
> sensitive to infrared).
>
> I tried to keep the f-stop small: f8 or f11 and in the 'sunny' pictures I was
> getting a shutter speed of about 1/60th (which roughly equates to the sunny 16
> rule - taking into account the film speed and the filter).

Very nice images! So, how was the film processed?

Geoff
--
**********************************************
Geoff McAuliffe, Ph.D.
Neuroscience and Cell Biology
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854
voice: (732)-235-4583; fax: -4029
mcauliff@xxxxxxxxx
**********************************************


*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************