Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Maco vs. Konica-base + fog ?


  • From: "phillip geller" <filje@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Maco vs. Konica-base + fog ?
  • Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:07:28 -0500


Subject: Maco vs. Konica-base + fog ?


> I recently shot a few rolls of both maco and konica
> IR.  My question is, after developing them, the konica
> has a medium grey base and the maco is clear.  I used
> the same chemistry on both.  They were done within
> hours of each other.  I guess my question is is this a
> normal base for konica?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom

In short, yes. 
The maco is very clear , while the konica incorporates some base dye.
My last batch of konica that I bought (3/2000 127)
which was always refrigerated has almost twice the base development 
fog level of the previous batch. 

Phil
phillip geller photography
http://pages.prodigy.net/filje


*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************