Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[MF3D.FORUM:55] Re: Apparent image size, MF verus


  • From: Michael Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:55] Re: Apparent image size, MF verus
  • Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 09:59:30 -0800

One also perhaps could add viewmaster format and with the 
appropriate viewer Mag come out to 250.00 Apparent size as
well.  How close does the available 12x Dukes viewer come?

Mike K.

Alan Lewis wrote:
> 
> I've modified Paul's very good table again, using the ideal situation
> where the full frame size is used for apparent size comparison vs.
> diagonal measurement.  I keep doing this because the mask size is a
> mechanical limitation applied by the limitations of equipment.  To first
> understand the relationships between formats I like to isolate the
> variables to see where the problem first occurs.
> (BTW: Paul's use of this table idea is working very well.  We all see it
> in our own way, none of them necessarily the final word, just a tool).
> 
>  Format     Size       Diag      Viewer Mag       Apparent size
>  ------     ----       ----      ----------       -------------
>  5P         23 x 24    33.24     7.52 (250/diag)    250.00
>  7P         24 x 30    38.42     6.51 (250/diag)    250.00
>  MF         60 x 60    84.85     2.95 (250/diag)    250.00
>  3Disc      24 x 36    43.27     5.78 (250/diag)    250.00
>  6x7        60 x 70    92.20     2.71 (250/diag)    250.00