Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[MF3D.FORUM:612] Re: Thanks Paul


  • From: "Stuart Johnson - GCSPHOTO" <GCSPHOTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:612] Re: Thanks Paul
  • Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 16:25:09 -0700

Kudo's to Kevin Chou for saving and retrieving the Film
ecommendations!  -Awesome!

By the way kevin,  I really hope you consider DUAL cameras as you will have
even more enjoyable results if the two images are snapped at the same time.
The little differences that pop up (literally) when using a slide bar can
ruin an otherwise good picture.  The mind instantly recognizes imperfections
like a leaf out of position, a flag furled differently, etc...

Good luck with the Pentax!

    Cheers,  -Stuart

----- Original Message -----
From: <ChouMaster@xxxxxxx>
To: Medium Format 3D Photography <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 12:54 PM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:608] Thanks Paul


> As I was on the edge to unsubscribe from the MF3D, there came Paul Talbot
to
> the rescue. He showed me how to change to the digest distribution mode,
that
> is much better for me, Now I am in again.  To stay in this interactive 3-D
> encyclopedia is very enjoyable.  All those brain power and knowledge out
> there is awesome. Thanks Paul.
>
> As for my MF3D adventure is ready but not yet started.  Meanwhile, I am
> concentrating in my 35 mm full frame 3-D.  Once I get some time, I'll
start
> me MF3D.  I have a Pentax 6X7, with 55 mm and 165 mm lenses, 2X converter
and
> both sets of close-up extension tubes.  I even made a slide bar for it
> already.  My main concern is about the 2 1/4 X 2 3/4 format may not fit
any
> standard MF3D mount.  Are there any mounting cards can fit the 6X7cm with
> landscape and portrait mode? How about viewers?
>
> Stuart asked if anyone can provide the film recommendations came out in
the
> forum some time ago.  I have been saving all those goodies in my file, so
I
> can be easily pull out the info he needs.  Here it is:
>
> Subj:    [MF3D.FORUM:443] Re: s.unh.edu
> Date:   4/26/00 6:11:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time
> From:   davewill0@xxxxxxxxx (David Williams)
>
> Stuart Johnson - wrote:
> Question  1:   Does anyone have an opinion as to what the best daylight
color
> print film is for MF3D work? Especially for Structures and Landscapes?
and
> Indoor film? (Weddings and Portraits)  -My experience has been limited to
> Royal Gold, Kodachrome & Ektachrome.
>
> For medium format print work I use the Fuji line of professional films.
NPS
> rated at 160 is my favorite for portraits where I have control over
lighting.
>  It has gorgeous skin tones, good latitude and no grain up to 16x20.
>
> I use NHGII, rated at 800, for weddings and natural light portraits. Same
> beautiful look, not enough grain to notice, and wonderfully printable
negs.
>
> For outdoors, the NPS is a good low contrast, saturated film.  For more
> punch, like you're used to with the Royal Gold, Kodak's Portra VC is good.
> But you can also get Fuji 100 in 120 size, and I like that better.
>
> By the way, the Fuji pro films have an extra dye layer to filter out some
of
> the florescent green, which makes them great for weddings.  NPS is a
favorite
> of many architectural shooters for interiors.   Dave Williams
>
> Have a good ddday.
>
> Kevin Chou
>