Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[MF3D.FORUM:749] Re: I need a MF 3D Dr.


  • From: "Bill Glickman" <bglick@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:749] Re: I need a MF 3D Dr.
  • Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 11:21:52 -0700

Thanks Greg, I have many of these unmountable shots.... I just finished a
roll of 1 / 20th rule, and will report back to the list later today.

Bill G



----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Erker" <erker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 7:45 AM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:745] Re: I need a MF 3D Dr.


>
> >Maybe your eyes are simply intolerant of exaggerated stereo depth.  If
so, you
> >might try setting far point to infinity in your stereo base calculations
> >for all
> >shots.  You might also try reducing on-film deviation to, say, 2.0mm.
But
> >remember that if you overdo it you'll end up with flat slides.  Finally,
you
> >might try exercising you eyes, say by freeviewing parallel and cross-eyed
> >stereo
> >pairs, so they attain more flexibility.  But then again, you might end up
> >losing
> >what seems to be the visual equivalent of perfect pitch.
> >
> >As for mounting, it would be no surprise if on-film deviation did not
come
> >exactly as calculated.  However, it should have come close to 2.7mm.  Did
it?
>
>   I agree with this. Bill, has anyone
> else viewed your MF slides and had the
> same problem?
>
>   Though if you shoot 35mm and have no
> trouble with 7' to infinity shots then
> I don't know.
>
>   I hope you let someone on the list
> see your problem shots because I'd like
> this mystery to be solved.
>
> Greg E.
>