Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[MF3D.FORUM:749] Re: I need a MF 3D Dr.
- From: "Bill Glickman" <bglick@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:749] Re: I need a MF 3D Dr.
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 11:21:52 -0700
Thanks Greg, I have many of these unmountable shots.... I just finished a
roll of 1 / 20th rule, and will report back to the list later today.
Bill G
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Erker" <erker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 7:45 AM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:745] Re: I need a MF 3D Dr.
>
> >Maybe your eyes are simply intolerant of exaggerated stereo depth. If
so, you
> >might try setting far point to infinity in your stereo base calculations
> >for all
> >shots. You might also try reducing on-film deviation to, say, 2.0mm.
But
> >remember that if you overdo it you'll end up with flat slides. Finally,
you
> >might try exercising you eyes, say by freeviewing parallel and cross-eyed
> >stereo
> >pairs, so they attain more flexibility. But then again, you might end up
> >losing
> >what seems to be the visual equivalent of perfect pitch.
> >
> >As for mounting, it would be no surprise if on-film deviation did not
come
> >exactly as calculated. However, it should have come close to 2.7mm. Did
it?
>
> I agree with this. Bill, has anyone
> else viewed your MF slides and had the
> same problem?
>
> Though if you shoot 35mm and have no
> trouble with 7' to infinity shots then
> I don't know.
>
> I hope you let someone on the list
> see your problem shots because I'd like
> this mystery to be solved.
>
> Greg E.
>
|