Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[MF3D.FORUM:946] Re: Bill's MF mounting woes


  • From: "Bill Glickman" <bglick@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:946] Re: Bill's MF mounting woes
  • Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 20:16:41 -0700

Dave

        Sorry for the delayed response, on the road, hard to connect for
email.... thank you for working on my slides....  I am very surprised you
got those slides to fuse.   Without getting into the  details since I can
not correspond on a regular basis.... please try to explain this .....
Leaving out the one slide with the left and right reversed...I probably got
frustrated and tried anything.....

But my issue is this.... when I converted to 1/15th rule, vs. the John B
formula which those slides came from,  I did the exact same mounting
technique and was successful 100% of the time?   While the John B ones wihic
you have, every single roll I   shot would not fuse.

What could explain that?  could it possibly be your eyes are very flexible
and can fuse things the beginier can not?  Yes, I wish someone could work
with me face to face on this one.... and also I am forced to miss NSA due to
traveling.  DAMN!

Dave, where abouts do you live?  If I remember, Idaho, right?  what part?  I
am in WA now....

Any input would be helpful...

Regards

Bill G


----- Original Message -----
From: "David W. Kesner" <drdave@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <MF3d.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <bglick@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 6:49 PM
Subject: Bill's MF mounting woes


> I received three images from Bill Glickman in the mail today.
>
> 1) 747 behind a fence - no label
> 2) Lawn chairs and table on back patio - "labeled base too far"
> 3) Rock waterfall and pond - labeled "base too wide"
>
> I have good news - I was able to correct all the images and
> mount them so that they are viewable (although one was close
> to the 3mm maximum deviation due to a close object the I
> didn't want to violate the window). Here is what I found:
>
> 1) This was just mounted pseudo (right image where left should
> be and left where right should be)
> 2) and 3) These were mounted with infinity in front of the
> window and had from 7-10mm of deviation.
> 2) Both of these chips were trimmed on the left side only
> (right side still had frame borders)
> 3) Right chip had only the left border trimmed and the left
> chip had both sides trimmed.
>
> You are trimming the wrong sides of the chips and placing the
> window incorrectly.
>
> I could try to explain the stereo window here, but you really
> need to have someone show you in person (or read up on it in a
> book such as "The World Of 3-D" by Jac. G. Ferwerda). To tell
> you that you need to see more of the image on the left side of
> the right chip and the right side of the left chip probably
> wouldn't mean much to you.
>
> Please rest assured that your cameras are working fine and
> there is no problem with the stereobase (as long as you keep
> the closest objects at the minimum allowed distance).
>
> That's all for now,
>
> David W. Kesner
> Boise, Idaho, USA
> drdave@xxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message -----
From: "David W. Kesner" <drdave@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <bglick@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 6:49 PM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:796] Bill's MF mounting woes


> I received three images from Bill Glickman in the mail today.
>
> 1) 747 behind a fence - no label
> 2) Lawn chairs and table on back patio - "labeled base too far"
> 3) Rock waterfall and pond - labeled "base too wide"
>
> I have good news - I was able to correct all the images and
> mount them so that they are viewable (although one was close
> to the 3mm maximum deviation due to a close object the I
> didn't want to violate the window). Here is what I found:
>
> 1) This was just mounted pseudo (right image where left should
> be and left where right should be)
> 2) and 3) These were mounted with infinity in front of the
> window and had from 7-10mm of deviation.
> 2) Both of these chips were trimmed on the left side only
> (right side still had frame borders)
> 3) Right chip had only the left border trimmed and the left
> chip had both sides trimmed.
>
> You are trimming the wrong sides of the chips and placing the
> window incorrectly.
>
> I could try to explain the stereo window here, but you really
> need to have someone show you in person (or read up on it in a
> book such as "The World Of 3-D" by Jac. G. Ferwerda). To tell
> you that you need to see more of the image on the left side of
> the right chip and the right side of the left chip probably
> wouldn't mean much to you.
>
> Please rest assured that your cameras are working fine and
> there is no problem with the stereobase (as long as you keep
> the closest objects at the minimum allowed distance).
>
> That's all for now,
>
> David W. Kesner
> Boise, Idaho, USA
> drdave@xxxxxxxxxx
>


____________NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_________
Download Now     http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Request a CDROM  1-800-333-3633
___________________________________________________________