[MF3D.FORUM:976] Re: Bill's MF mounting woes

["Don Lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

this is don ,I will be in Seattle Wa as of Wed July 27 at [206] 824 4376]
Don.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Glickman" <bglick@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 8:16 PM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:946] Re: Bill's MF mounting woes


> Dave
>
>         Sorry for the delayed response, on the road, hard to connect for
> email.... thank you for working on my slides....  I am very surprised you
> got those slides to fuse.   Without getting into the  details since I can
> not correspond on a regular basis.... please try to explain this .....
> Leaving out the one slide with the left and right reversed...I probably
got
> frustrated and tried anything.....
>
> But my issue is this.... when I converted to 1/15th rule, vs. the John B
> formula which those slides came from,  I did the exact same mounting
> technique and was successful 100% of the time?   While the John B ones
wihic
> you have, every single roll I   shot would not fuse.
>
> What could explain that?  could it possibly be your eyes are very flexible
> and can fuse things the beginier can not?  Yes, I wish someone could work
> with me face to face on this one.... and also I am forced to miss NSA due
to
> traveling.  DAMN!
>
> Dave, where abouts do you live?  If I remember, Idaho, right?  what part?
I
> am in WA now....
>
> Any input would be helpful...
>
> Regards
>
> Bill G
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David W. Kesner" <drdave@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <MF3d.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <bglick@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 6:49 PM
> Subject: Bill's MF mounting woes
>
>
> > I received three images from Bill Glickman in the mail today.
> >
> > 1) 747 behind a fence - no label
> > 2) Lawn chairs and table on back patio - "labeled base too far"
> > 3) Rock waterfall and pond - labeled "base too wide"
> >
> > I have good news - I was able to correct all the images and
> > mount them so that they are viewable (although one was close
> > to the 3mm maximum deviation due to a close object the I
> > didn't want to violate the window). Here is what I found:
> >
> > 1) This was just mounted pseudo (right image where left should
> > be and left where right should be)
> > 2) and 3) These were mounted with infinity in front of the
> > window and had from 7-10mm of deviation.
> > 2) Both of these chips were trimmed on the left side only
> > (right side still had frame borders)
> > 3) Right chip had only the left border trimmed and the left
> > chip had both sides trimmed.
> >
> > You are trimming the wrong sides of the chips and placing the
> > window incorrectly.
> >
> > I could try to explain the stereo window here, but you really
> > need to have someone show you in person (or read up on it in a
> > book such as "The World Of 3-D" by Jac. G. Ferwerda). To tell
> > you that you need to see more of the image on the left side of
> > the right chip and the right side of the left chip probably
> > wouldn't mean much to you.
> >
> > Please rest assured that your cameras are working fine and
> > there is no problem with the stereobase (as long as you keep
> > the closest objects at the minimum allowed distance).
> >
> > That's all for now,
> >
> > David W. Kesner
> > Boise, Idaho, USA
> > drdave@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David W. Kesner" <drdave@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <bglick@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 6:49 PM
> Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:796] Bill's MF mounting woes
>
>
> > I received three images from Bill Glickman in the mail today.
> >
> > 1) 747 behind a fence - no label
> > 2) Lawn chairs and table on back patio - "labeled base too far"
> > 3) Rock waterfall and pond - labeled "base too wide"
> >
> > I have good news - I was able to correct all the images and
> > mount them so that they are viewable (although one was close
> > to the 3mm maximum deviation due to a close object the I
> > didn't want to violate the window). Here is what I found:
> >
> > 1) This was just mounted pseudo (right image where left should
> > be and left where right should be)
> > 2) and 3) These were mounted with infinity in front of the
> > window and had from 7-10mm of deviation.
> > 2) Both of these chips were trimmed on the left side only
> > (right side still had frame borders)
> > 3) Right chip had only the left border trimmed and the left
> > chip had both sides trimmed.
> >
> > You are trimming the wrong sides of the chips and placing the
> > window incorrectly.
> >
> > I could try to explain the stereo window here, but you really
> > need to have someone show you in person (or read up on it in a
> > book such as "The World Of 3-D" by Jac. G. Ferwerda). To tell
> > you that you need to see more of the image on the left side of
> > the right chip and the right side of the left chip probably
> > wouldn't mean much to you.
> >
> > Please rest assured that your cameras are working fine and
> > there is no problem with the stereobase (as long as you keep
> > the closest objects at the minimum allowed distance).
> >
> > That's all for now,
> >
> > David W. Kesner
> > Boise, Idaho, USA
> > drdave@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
>
> ____________NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_________
> Download Now     http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
> Request a CDROM  1-800-333-3633
> ___________________________________________________________
>