Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[MF3D.FORUM:954] Re: Re Scala (was First Impressions)
- From: Sam <3dhacker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:954] Re: Re Scala (was First Impressions)
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:38:16 -0600
I think one of the reasons I found these concerns about the grain and
density of Scala was the brightness of my viewer light. I favor a very
bright light source. My theory is that with my pupils contracted to a
suitable aperture I see sharper (like that optimum aperture in a camera).
Although I haven't measured it exactly, I tried to approximate looking out
a window on a sunny day. Perhaps I should get a consensus from those who
have viewed by black & white slides in their own viewer: do they appear too
dark?
It seems everyone uses a different light source for their viewers.
Steal-the-light types would tend to have less light unless the sun is
hitting the diffuser directly or the viewer is very close to a bare light
bulb. In dim light the shadow detail would appear darker, and if your eyes
see less detail in dimmer light, the grain would appear invisible. How
bright is your viewer Eric?
As bright as my viewer is, I still get black blacks in viewing Velvia (damn
film is bulletproof!), but Scala blacks appear 2 or 3 shades above that on
a tonal scale. Is there a high speed (ISO 400) Scala? What film did you use
Les?
If this was indeed a high speed film, then the results were indeed
expected. As for a standard or low ISO version, I would expect a lot less
grain.
Sam
|