Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: 220 frame counting


  • From: Tom Deering <tmd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: 220 frame counting
  • Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:19:43 -0500

On 12/1/99, Paul Talbot wrote:

>Um, well, ..difficult to "resolve to the nth degree of
>precision," perhaps.  ;-)

You expressed your results in 0.25 turn increments, Paul, and I 
expressed mine in 0.1 turns.  That's not much difference in 
precision.

>So for all these reasons combined, I take a "loosey
>goosey" approach to the film wind-on issue.  It thus
>becomes not that big a deal, really, IMO.

Our results are similar.  Both show the  number of turns decreases at 
an uneven, difficult-to-guess rate.  So far, both are untested.

The only real difference between our methods is that mine is flat 
wrong.  :^)  :^)  I forgot that circumference is based on diameter, 
not radius.  Heh, heh.
 
Also, my assumptions about the length of the paper leader were wrong, 
according to the web site Brian gave.  I wish I had time to correct 
the spreadsheet, but I can't right now.

>Most likely,
>however, I did lose the first and last (12th? 13th?) to
>not having a full left and right frame on the film.

Two lost pair, which is the same as if you turned the knob a fixed 
three turns each time.  I'm sure I would forget how many I had shot, 
especially if a couple days passed.  At lease if you always turned 
three times, there's nothing to remember, and no chance of overlapped 
frames.

I probably should point out that I have never shot a roll of 220 in 
my life.  I don't even have a working camera right now.

Tom
-- -- --
Y2K advisory:  Nostradamus was wrong in July, and GPS didn't collapse 
in August.  All that's left are cynical marketing and scams.  At this 
point, anyone who cries "end of the world" is trying to scare you 
into buying something.

Computer bug?  Get real.  Think about it: For years already, most car 
and house payments have extended past the year 2000. But have you 
heard of an actual glitch of any kind, anywhere?  Your bill has been 
correct to the penny, right?  No major company is stupid enough to 
let Y2K cost them money.

Don't fall for empty Y2K hype.  Don't do anything nutty.