Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: 220 frame counting
- From: Tom Deering <tmd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 220 frame counting
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:19:43 -0500
On 12/1/99, Paul Talbot wrote:
>Um, well, ..difficult to "resolve to the nth degree of
>precision," perhaps. ;-)
You expressed your results in 0.25 turn increments, Paul, and I
expressed mine in 0.1 turns. That's not much difference in
precision.
>So for all these reasons combined, I take a "loosey
>goosey" approach to the film wind-on issue. It thus
>becomes not that big a deal, really, IMO.
Our results are similar. Both show the number of turns decreases at
an uneven, difficult-to-guess rate. So far, both are untested.
The only real difference between our methods is that mine is flat
wrong. :^) :^) I forgot that circumference is based on diameter,
not radius. Heh, heh.
Also, my assumptions about the length of the paper leader were wrong,
according to the web site Brian gave. I wish I had time to correct
the spreadsheet, but I can't right now.
>Most likely,
>however, I did lose the first and last (12th? 13th?) to
>not having a full left and right frame on the film.
Two lost pair, which is the same as if you turned the knob a fixed
three turns each time. I'm sure I would forget how many I had shot,
especially if a couple days passed. At lease if you always turned
three times, there's nothing to remember, and no chance of overlapped
frames.
I probably should point out that I have never shot a roll of 220 in
my life. I don't even have a working camera right now.
Tom
-- -- --
Y2K advisory: Nostradamus was wrong in July, and GPS didn't collapse
in August. All that's left are cynical marketing and scams. At this
point, anyone who cries "end of the world" is trying to scare you
into buying something.
Computer bug? Get real. Think about it: For years already, most car
and house payments have extended past the year 2000. But have you
heard of an actual glitch of any kind, anywhere? Your bill has been
correct to the penny, right? No major company is stupid enough to
let Y2K cost them money.
Don't fall for empty Y2K hype. Don't do anything nutty.
|