Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Rikenon lens matching

  • From: Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Rikenon lens matching
  • Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1998 17:34:21 -0500
Greg Erker wrote:

>   The results are that the Erker lens magic appears to
> be still holding

So, you had some doubt that it would?  8-)

> Let's call Lens #1 the reference. So the relative FL's are:
> #2: 0.53% bigger image based on diags, 0.34% based on H&V.
> #3: 0.36% bigger image based on diags, 0.23% based on H&V.
> #4: 1.13% bigger image based on diags, 0.92% based on H&V.
> #5: 0.24% bigger image based on diags, 0.58% based on Vert only.


Well, looks to me like either you really do have the best (lens) karma
in the universe or production tolerances were quite a bit better than we
have been led to believe...


Eric G.