Re: Spud sightings (using 220)

[Joel Alpers <joel.alpers@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul Talbot wrote:
> 

> 
> I decided to leave all the 220 home, not really having time
> to mess with figuring out the best approach to using it.  (That
> leaves me with only 4 rolls of 120 to take along, however.) Even
> as these last few minutes wind down, I'm still trying to decide
> whether to take the Ricohflex rig or not.  (I already decided to
> leave the "slide bar" home.)  If anyone has any quick thoughts
> about the relative quality of results I should expect between
> Sam's Spud and a pair of (exposure-mismatched) Ricohflexes, I
> have a few minutes left to read and consider them!  ;-)
> 

Don't have those suggestions, but you know the Ricohflex
will have the same problems with 220 as the spud...

You will very likely be able to find places on the way to
buy 120 film, too, though not as cheap as B&H ....

Joel.