Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Insomnia = brilliance?
- From: Joel Alpers <joel.alpers@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Insomnia = brilliance?
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 13:46:50 -0600
Sam Jr. writes:
>
> I had some trouble sleeping one night
> in the middle of last week so I started
> thinking about the perennial problem of
> how to get a better MF stereo camera than
> the Sputnik (more shutter speeds, better
> viewfinder, better lenses, f32 in order of my
> priorities).
Good priority list.
Greg, I don't wish insomnia on you or anyone, but it
sure seems like you've used it well!
> So I decided I had the skills to siamese
> two Diacords
You and others have mentioned Diacords here before, but
I'm not sure I know what they are.
ooh, hold it a minute...
OK, I'm back (did you miss me??? ;) I figured I'd find the answer
on your WEB page. For anyone else who wants more info, check out:
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/erker/diacordl.html
and:
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/erker/diacordg.html
Question: which model do you have???
You mentioned f/32 on your wish list, but you show these all
as having maximum of f/22.
Though on your diacordg.html page, you say 'f/22 *' but there's
no (that I could see) footnote for the '*'...
[ snip ]
>
> But now: if the ebay 225's shutter blades
> are okay, Sam may be able to use it as the
> slave shutter even thought the shutter is
> broken for other uses.
Very likely!
[ snip ]
> ---
> Nap time Saturday: I couldn't sleep again
> so I took my 225 apart again. This time
> to investigate the twinning issues.
>
> I figured out how to couple the focus,
> modify it so that I can get f32, and roughly
> how I'm going to couple the two film spools
> together.
>
> Later Beth and I went to the hobby shop to
> look at model airplane linkages to couple
> the focus (brass tubing force fit over the
> distance point to extend its length for
> the ball part of the ball and socket -
> for Bob's info).
Question: was Beth much help? <grin>
> Anyway, I'm 99% certain I can twin the
> cameras. I'm less certain about linking
> the apertures (but I could live without).
It'd be nice to find a way. Linked apertures
doesn't seem important until you use the camera ;)
[ snip ]
> Now we just need a way to check lens
> FL's without blowing lots of film. More
> on this in another email. (Since it took
> Don Lopp 7 or 8 Diacords to get a matched
> set.)
Do you have a medium format projector? One method Les and I used
when choosing Olympus XA2's:
1. Loaded each camera to be checked with a short length of bulk
B/W film.
2. Set up a tripod, and shot each camera in turn at the same scene,
which had a couple of fence posts at each end of the scene.
3. After developing, mounted the film in slide mounts and projected
it at a wall with a long sheet of paper.
4. Line up the left fence post with a line on the wall. Mark the
location of the right post, labelling it with the camera #.
5. This graphically shows the differences, and with a tape measure,
you can calculate % differences.
If you're willing to unload in a darkroom you could check up to
ten cameras with a single roll of 120 B/W film.
> I just had to share this - Greg
Greg - thanks for the detailed report! Keep us up to date
on this project!
Joel.
|