[MF3D.FORUM:1061] Re: Mounting issue

["Bill Glickman" <bglick@xxxxxxxx>]

Sorry David, it was Dick Twitchell that left one for me to change...I got
your note mixed up with his....... but all yours were fine, I had no
problems or eyestrain at all...

       Now that I just spend today mounting again.... I have constantly been
bumping into this problem of the right chip having more of the left scene in
it...however, now that I have been so well coached at mounting, I
immediately know when things don't fuse perfectly or something does not seem
just right, I switch the two around and voila, perfect everytime.

        I really have to work on mounting my cameras more square... my
eyeballing techniques are what caused this problem.   Just a degree or two
off can cause this problem. And all along I blamed the John B formula....
John, if you are out there... please accept my apologies, just a dose of
massive inexperience at work!!!  Thanks guys..

Regards
Bill G




----- Original Message -----
From: <drdave@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 3:48 PM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1060] Re: Mounting issue


> Hello Bill,
>
> > You re-mounted 2 of the 3 slides a sent you.
>
> No, I remounted all three.
>
> > the gazebo shot was a bit more hard to fully fuse at
> > once...but not the
> > least bit uncomfortable.  I think this is good evidence that I can
> > toleratea lot of on film deviation, right?   The third one you
> > mentioned was pseudo, I switched them and they worked perfect
>
> You might be mixing up which I did. One was patio furniture, one was a
> pond and rock waterfall, and the pseudo (which I did remount correctly)
> was an airplane through a chain link fence.
>
> The pond and waterfall had the greatest deviation because of that tree
> branch hanging down on the side. This is the one that might cause the
> most problems.
>
> That's all for now,
>
> David W. Kesner
> Boise, Idaho, USA
> drdave@xxxxxxxxxx
>