Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[MF3D.FORUM:1148] Re: Miniturization
- From: "Don Lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1148] Re: Miniturization
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:21:01 -0700
AS to use of several camers, probably 1 half of my MF shots involve 2
cameras though most of the time it is not noticeable to the viewer if a
decent viewer is used [ according to my experince]. I do not understand
this ad-nasium discusion about Miniturization which reminds me of the
Deviation which to me also involved the blind leading the blind in my
opinion-.
----- Original Message -----
From: "mail" <TCNET058@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 4:22 AM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1112] Miniturization
> I have been following the "miniturization" discussion with some
> interest. Comments were made on here suggesting that 65mm is the maximum
> separation to avoid the "mini" effect.
> I was curious to know how many on here using medium format for stereo
> are doing twin-camera vs slide-bar?
>
> -Fred Sole
>
|