Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[MF3D.FORUM:1149] Re: Miniturization
- From: "Dr. George A. Themelis" <DrT-3d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1149] Re: Miniturization
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:45:47 -0400
At 02:21 PM 8/22/00 -0700, you wrote:
>AS to use of several camers, probably 1 half of my MF shots involve 2
>cameras though most of the time it is not noticeable to the viewer if a
>decent viewer is used [ according to my experince]. I do not understand
>this ad-nasium discusion about Miniturization which reminds me of the
>Deviation which to me also involved the blind leading the blind in my
>opinion-.
Hi Don,
Exactly which part don't you understand? The miniaturization
effect that results from a hyperstereo, or the hyperstereo
nature of using 175mm stereo base? So, in your opinion,
using 175mm stereo base is not wide enough to exhibit any
miniaturization in a given scene? A lot depends on your
subject. As Abram said, and I agree, a base of 175 mm
for "home and garden" shots is too large. But for a wide
variety of scenics and distant shots, it might not be a problem.
George
|