Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[MF3D.FORUM:1237] Re: Loss of detail in projection (was Re:PSA Albuquerque report, Part II)
- From: drdave@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1237] Re: Loss of detail in projection (was Re:PSA Albuquerque report, Part II)
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:59:14 -0600
Dr. T. writes:
> OK, now tell us: Do these factors depend on the format?
NO as long as you are comparing the same format to the same format. It
is the viewing method and not the format that "degrades" the image. A
MF slide in the BEST hand viewer will look better in all respects to
the same image projected with the BEST projection system. If you used
the best projector and the worst viewer all bets are off *{;-)
Obviously the best MF slide will always be better than the best 35mm
slide. And probably a projected MF slide will be better than a
handviewed 35mm. This is just a guess as have not yet seen a projected
MF slide.
It is also my opinion that the amount of this "degradation" is the
same. A 35mm image will be degraded say 10% (arbitrary number) as will
a MF image. But if a MF image is 50% (arbitrary again) better to begin
with then the perceived degradation might be less. I have probably not
stated this very well so I hope you understand what I am trying to say.
That's all for now,
David W. Kesner
Boise, Idaho, USA
drdave@xxxxxxxxxx
|