Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[MF3D.FORUM:1249] Re: MF3D Projection
- From: Sam <3dhacker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1249] Re: MF3D Projection
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 18:12:45 -0600
>If you are lucky like me (I am just starting MF and have only shot
>three rolls so far) you can just shoot in camera dupes with one for
>hand viewing and one for projection. As they say - film is cheap!
>However, if you have a big backlog of images then you do have to make
>the choice to unmount and remount. Of course with in camera dupes that
>means only three stereo pairs from a 120 roll.
>
The "in camera" dupes has never been a realistic option for anything but
static scenes. How do you do "in camera" dupes of motion, portraiture, or
wildlife? Most MF stereo cameras I know of take a long time between shots
because of manual advancing and cocking, further making the possibility of
a good match difficult. A show consisting of MF stereos of fruit bowls on a
table would definately not be as appealing!
What we really need is 120 dupe film and someone interested in duping for a
reasonable price, say 100% over 35mm dupes. Tain't nobody on my end of the
pond!
>As has already been discussed here, there are benefits to a projected
>show (no matter what the format). It will definitely be worth it for
>the audience. Whether or not it will be for you is a personal decision.
>
Hmmm... seems I missed them. I'm talking strictly MF Stereo here, and I
haven't heard of any definitive arguments for it yet. Duping 120 to 35mm
still seems more practical to me for projection. Please prove me wrong!!!!!!
Sam
|