Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[MF3D.FORUM:1338] Re: Larger aperture size for twin rig shots?
- From: "Don Lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1338] Re: Larger aperture size for twin rig shots?
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:17:07 -0800
Paul T spoke of taking hyper pictures using a stereo base of 6 inches, 12
inches and24 inches while having a stereo window at 7 feet which is not
compatable eith taking pictures with a depth of from 7 to 10 feet. 90% of my
pictures are sharp from 12 feet to infinity ( I have stereo depth out to
about 200 to 300 feet ) sharp M F is that way- especially in a decent viewer
which is more than I can say about 35m m stereo ( my prejudice is showing. I
do not know of any words capable of describing M F but it can be great- just
ask anyone that uses it such as Paul , Sam, Greg and the rest of us lucky
guys.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Abram Klooswyk" <abram.klooswyk@xxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 2:36 PM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1337] Re: Larger aperture size for twin rig shots?
> Don Lopp 12 Nov 2000:
> >I am at a loss to understand how one can successfully
> >utilize a 7 ft window with M F stereo. Depth of focus
> >requires at least f 32 or f 45 ...
>
> Not all pictures need reaching to infinity, in fact
> the best part of normal (about 65 mm) base stereopictures
> is often between 7 and 10 feet (2 to 3 m).
> When depth of field is restricted, it is better to cut
> at the far end of the scene than at the near end, in
> my opinion. At infinity there is no stereoperception...
> (Not specific for MF.)
>
> Abram Klooswyk
>
>
|