Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[MF3D.FORUM:1607] Re: MF Expo


  • From: "Don Lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1607] Re: MF Expo
  • Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 19:25:06 -0800

Expo 2000 , I think I should comment on it before I forget what I saw. First
I think that Paul Talbot deserves a lot of thanks for including the MF
viewer so that all could see the slides under simular conditions. It
contained slides of all qualities-well mounted and poorly mounted. 3 slides
were taken - 2 of Hawaii one of a bridge -all wth miss matched ( focal
length ) lenses which did not appear to ruin the stereo aspect of  the
slides ( how many noticed it besides me ? ). Some had exagerated deviation
along with poor synchronization - who noticed besides nitpicker me ?. I hope
Paul tries this again as words do a poor job of showing the virtues of MF as
compared with the real thing. I consider 35 mm very good for snap shots
where-as MF is good for serious scenics- as I have said before I consider 35
mm stereo a toy thouhg sometimes a serious toy DON.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Simon" <msimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 2:38 PM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1606] MF Expo


> It was very inspiring to see the images in the Expo and I'm very glad
> I got a chance to see them.  I thank everyone who contributed such fine
> images to show us what can be done.  I have tried some photography
> with my Sputnik with poor results so far, so it was good to see that
> quality work is possible and get inspired to try again.
>    After looking at the images I looked at some Realist images and
> first thought they appeared smaller and the edges were more prominent.
> However after looking more carefully I decided that the apparent images
> were not that different in size.  However there is a big difference
> in the richness and textures in the images.  Afterwards I read the
> included article by McKay who explains that.
>    The Expo went last night to the Southern California Stereo
> club meeting where many people got a chance to view the images.
> It should be on its way to Texas shortly.
>
> Thanks again to all who contributed images and let us image poor souls
> see them.  Thanks also to Paul Talbot who did a lot of work organizing
> Expo and is keeping it on track and getting it wide exposure.
>
> Martin Simon
>
>