Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[MF3D.FORUM:1699] Re: I got the MF Blues
- From: "Don Lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1699] Re: I got the MF Blues
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 19:50:55 -0700
I am a bit cofused about the Sputnik being sharpest at f / 11.0 News to me
having tested at least11 of them so far and only one was tolerable at F
/11.0 Would be glad to help IF you send Camera.DC LOPP 20814 8th Ave S
Des MOINES WA,98198.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brenda Nowlan" <bknowlan@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 12:10 PM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1688] I got the MF Blues
> Does anyone know what the best setting is on the Sputnik for focus?
> He is my dilemma:
> I mostly do street photography. When I use my 35mm cameras
> I am overall pleased with the results. However, I find it
> difficult to get the same sharpness with my Sputnik. I use
> a Nikon loupe on the viewfinder to make sure I have sharp
> focus. But, when I get my slides back, there is usually
> some other part that is in better focus than the part I want
> (did I confuse everyone?). David Kesner posted recently
> that the best fstop is f11 on the Sputnik. So if I set it
> at f11, what would be the best focusing be that would make
> it more like a point and shoot?
> About 6 months ago, I bought a used Fuji GA645wi. You can
> turn these on end and get landscape proportions. Also, it
> would enable you to have the lenses much closer together and
> it even has a cable release. I was thinking down the road,
> I might get a second body. But, when I get my slides back,
> they look dark and contrasty. Very contrasty. I'm using
> Provia and Sensia and have been taking them to a 3hr lab for
> processing (not doing it myself).
> All I want is to take sharp, well exposed, MF slides. Is
> that so wrong?
> Brenda
> (sigh)
>
>
|