Re: OK to have fun/color

[Alan Zinn <azinn@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At 09:14 PM 11/23/1998 -0500, you wrote:
>In a message dated 11/23/98 7:37:47 PM Canada Central Standard Time,
>azinn@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
><<  It was an image of a dying, syphilitic woman with
> wonderful color that was gorgeously illuminated.  >>
>
>Do you think that was accidental or artistic? That is assuming you can accept
>the possibility of something being a"artistic" which isn't your particular
>"cup of tea".
>
>....steven
>
Steven,
That had to be accidental -  my point is that you are stuck with ambient
color (and picture editor). I have another example re, color.  This months
U.S News has a series of essays about various American towns. Some are color
some are in b/w. Check out which pictures are more successful. There are
good examples of each.  Why does color work for some and not for others? I
think the series on Memphis is very good.

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/981130/30memp.htm

AZ
>
Lookaround Cameras are more fun.

See cameras and pictures at:
http://www.keva.com/lookaround
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Gallery/8874

Also at Cafe Society Gallery:
http://www.curdev.hull.ac.uk/root/cafe/cafegal.htm