Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: 70MM Development
- From: Don Roberts <droberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 70MM Development
- Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 12:30:51 -0500
Simon, I hope I am not being insensitive about a medical condition or
visual problem but if you can read our posts why do you have to use such
extremely large type for your own? It does make things a little
inconvenient for the rest of us. If you have a compelling reason I will
certainly accept it otherwise I would hope you would be considerate of
the rest of us.
To Andy Buck. I can't answer your question about browser setting type
size without looking into it but I get 3/4" high letters from Simon both
on Netscape and on IE 4.5.
Simon Nathan wrote:
> dear steve- i write large so that i can read it. even caps in
> typewriter size plus 17" monitor seem small. simon says!
>
> Steve Shapiro wrote:
>
>> would you mind correcting your font size?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Simon Nathan <simonwide@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Simon Nathan
>> <simonwide@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thursday, January 07, 1999 9:09 AM
>> Subject: Re: 70MM Developmentlordy, andy- you've invented
>> the new streaking for 70mm. copyright it before everyone
>> knows how you've done it. ever pre-wet film before the
>> fast working developer is applied? you concealed the
>> overall developing time. ever hear of nitrogen burst? all
>> of these factors relate to each other.you didn't say
>> diameter of 70mm reel or total developing time. simon
>> nathan
>>
>> Andy Buck wrote:
>>
>> > The following is minimally related to panorama. I'm just
>> > calling on
>> > all that expertise and experience out there!
>> >
>> > I have started shooting 70mm Tri-X in 5 meter rolls. I
>> > have a Nikkor
>> > tank and reel. Using the same agitation as with 120 in
>> > normal tanks
>> > which works fine (3 inversions every 30 seconds), I get
>> > uneven edge
>> > development, i.e. denser and contrastier edges. If I cut
>> > back to 2
>> > inversions, that problem almost completely disappears,
>> > but I'm now
>> > getting uneven development in open areas, i.e. blotchy
>> > skies. Other
>> > than A.not using 70mm and B. not shooting skies, does
>> > anybody have any
>> > suggestions?
>> >
>> > Thanks!!!
>> > _________________________________________________________
>> >
>> > DO YOU YAHOO!?
>> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
--
==========================================================
Don Roberts * Bittersweet Productions * Iowa City, IA
* *
"Ignorance is not bliss - it is oblivion." - Philip Wylie
==========================================================
|