Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Settling for an FT-2 = good move????
- From: Willem-Jan Markerink <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Settling for an FT-2 = good move????
- Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 17:30:53 +0000
On 1 Feb 99 at 23:06, YDegroot@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Bad move? the FT-2 doesn't have a sharp lens, and loading the film in separate
> cartridges is a pain in the neck.
>
> Better buy a bottom line 120 Noblex, and crop the 120 images to whatever ratio
> you like. Much, mch, MUCH sharper! And sa,me 50mm lens perspective as the FT-2
Or go crazy, and use a Noblex 175 for this purpose....same horizontal
angle, but 17cm wide, instead of 12....:-))
Bit more expensive though....8-))
Btw, has anyone ever pondered about modifying a Noblex 150 to accept 35mm
cartridges?....I guess creating a set of curved filmrail in the
middle would be the hardest part....spooling from one 35mm cartridge
to the other doesn't seem impossible (how does the Mamiya 7 handle
this problem btw?)
I know, I know, price-wise you don't gain that much....but some films
can't be had in 120/220, only in 35mm, like infrared (cutting down
70mm perforated is another solution, but conflicts with the rest of
the 'infrastructure', and would be an even larger loading hassle).
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
|