Re: Web Page to Charles Tait and simon replies

["Mitchell P. Warner" <indepth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Charles,

	If one were to agree that simon's 

		'large text, text on top of text and so on are not,,, relevance to 
panoramic photography',   
	
	ignoring the fact simon was and is 'panoramic-in-vivo'    

				then, how to classify your reply?

mpw


At 01:02 AM 2/23/99 -0500, you wrote:
> charles- you were quick to shoot off your mouth voicing your objection. i
>don't know what caused that and i have asked this question on line to learn
>the cause so i could learn to avoid doing this dastardly deed you find so
>offensive. nada! simon nathan behind his rock guarding his trannies from
>prevalent mould.  


Charles Tait wrote: My comments regarding large text,
>text on top of text and so on are not 
>directed at anyone in particular, but I fail to see their relevance to 
>panoramic photography.  Charles
>