Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: slide film
I used to do E6 myself with few problems until I saw the light and
switched to negative. As you say it is simple.
A decent sized waterbath sorts out the problem with temperature control;
one-shot chemistry and a decent measuring cylinder avoid problems with
developer consistency at least as well as lab monitoring procedures.
I could process a film for less than half of the charge at my local lab. I
could also have it finished and dry in about half the time it would take
me to go to the lab and back.
Peter Marshall
On Fixing Shadows and elsewhere:
http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ds8s
Family Pictures, German Indications, London demonstrations &
The Buildings of London etc: http://www.spelthorne.ac.uk/pm/
> Why?
>
> The process is simple, hard to control and cheaper at the lab.
>
> S. Shapiro
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lee, Martin (Ex AS01) <MLee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: 'Panorama mailing list' <panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 11:22 PM
> Subject: slide film
>
>
> > does anybody know how difficult it is to develop your own slide film.
> >
> > I have no experience developing my own film (of any type), I am simply
> > interested in the practicallity of doing it myself for slides because
> there
> > is no messing around with paper etc. ie. less to mess up. and less
> > equipment.
> >
> > Are the chemicals as easily available as those for b&w film?
> >
> > What's the deal?
> > any comments welcome.
> >
> > thankyou,
> > Martin.
> >
>
>
>
|