![]()
|
![]() |
Re: Horseman SW 612 plus ralph jefferson neidlinger
joel- the shift on horseman is more of a selling feature. on 4x5 it ain't much even if the lens did cover. one list member said 15mm shift. bfd. that's 7.5 mm each may. the late, great frits rotgans and simon used to talk late into the night, sitting in his living room in amsterdam. i forgot about a second camera he womped up for me. he was good and he shared his skill with that unskilled american. my theory was we get the film transport mechanism and build forward. frits didn't tech me about off center mounting of lens on 8x10 view cameras. it was ralph jefferson neidlinger at 1940's mayfield photos. he showed me on the ground glass how to get more of the circle of coverage without the tilt. no danged camera magazine can show ya that this reality is practical and important. back to frits. because he is drinking french water (wine) he is patient with me. i've traded stuff with him so that i now have a plaubel 120 film magazine vintage of lindberg's plane. 6x9. ya got that? what i wanna have is maximum travel within image circle. voila. it is off center and you simply turn camera upside dow for rise, opposite for max drop. the sneaky part is the lens covers in the first place. to get good stuff from this 90mm angulon simply center it. this was done by frits, handcraft from used plywood and whole darn lensboard on dutch window glides slides either way. it was tight, really tight, no tensioning screws. simon nathan by the way, this was before marty forscher did my first model super wide to have a rising from. took two years of begging and pleading and a further threat, that i would tell people he did great bronica repairs. and me i'm not that brilliant as i'd heard about ralph steiner's such from david b. eisendrath. Joel Seaman wrote: Don,
|
||||||
|