Re: nytimes 11-5-99

[jonee <ctiedemann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear whoever,

in case you haven't heard, IPIrX is a low quality immersive imaging 
solution and the practices of IPrIX are less than ethical. They persecute 
optics professors and anyone challenging (or not) their ridiculous patent 
claim.

I am sorry to hear that another medium has been fooled by the IPrIX 
propaganda and can only hope that they go down the drain, as they haven't 
made a single dollar, it is all IPO money, and then, the NYT really is 
not what it used to be. 

Very stupid decision to go with IPrIXes horrible quality. Did they pay 
someone to adopt IPrIX or is someone in charge of multimedia THAT blind 
that he/she chose the very worst of VR technologies?

You "big guys" almost always get it wrong, _they_ seem to be able to coax 
you into an image-sinking, stinking IPrIX solution. 

Congratulations! 

C. Tiedemann